In the wake of "Schrems II," the future of data transfers is on shaky ground. True, the Biden administration has demonstrated that it is taking trans-Atlantic data flows seriously after appointing Christopher Hoff, CIPP/E, CIPP/US, CIPM, in January, not long after Joe Biden was inaugurated. And though both the U.S. Department of Commerce and European Commission are working together in earnest, short of changing its national security laws, what else can be done to prevent another legal challenge and potential invalidation to a future agreement? Baker MacKenzie Global Data Privacy and Security Group Chair Brian Hengesbaugh, CIPP/US, has an idea. Using his background in international policy and data protection, Hengesbaugh thinks now is the time for the Biden administration to “go big” and initiate an international treaty among democratic nations and their shared values around both human rights and national security. He explains to IAPP Editorial Director Jedidiah Bracy, CIPP, in this latest episode of The Privacy Advisor Podcast.
11 March 2021
Is a 'multilateral privacy treaty' the answer to 'Schrems II'?
Related stories
Notes from the Asia-Pacific region: OPC's final guidance on Privacy Act amendment supports practical, pragmatic approach
EU Data Act operational impacts: Compliance and technical considerations of cloud switching
A view from Brussels: Reading Nobel Prize recipient Albert Camus
From CIPP to career: Mapping the next chapter of privacy work
CalPrivacy staff offers first look at DROP system
This article is eligible for Continuing Professional Education credits. Please self-submit according to CPE policy guidelines.
