ANALYSISMEMBER

A year in review: Privacy, data security enforcement by New York's attorney general

Published
Subscribe to IAPP Newsletters

Contributors:

Carrie Cohen

Partner

Morrison Foerster

Boris Segalis

Partner

Goodwin Procter

Katherine Wang

CIPP/US, CIPM

Associate

Morrison Foerster

Editor's note: The IAPP is policy neutral. We publish contributed opinion and analysis pieces to enable our members to hear a broad spectrum of views in our domains.

State attorneys general are rapidly ramping up privacy and cybersecurity enforcement, launching aggressive investigations and imposing multimillion-dollar fines. Among those leading the charge is the New York attorney general.

In 2024, the Office of the New York State Attorney General marked a milestone in its privacy and cybersecurity enforcement. Leveraging the expertise of its Bureau of Information and Technology, the New York attorney general resolved allegations of privacy and cybersecurity breaches by settling with 12 companies — having initiated litigation against two of these companies — and imposing financial penalties exceeding USD14 million. This robust enforcement — mirroring the high pace of 2023 and far surpassing previous years — signals a sustained commitment to upholding rigorous data protection standards.

The attorney general's approach to privacy, cyber enforcement

The New York attorney general's office is empowered by broad statutes and the ability to impose significant fines and seek extensive injunctive relief for what it views as deceptive privacy and cybersecurity practices. The attorney general is the chief law enforcement officer of the state by statute and as an elected official, the current attorney general's policy objectives may shift the office's enforcement priorities — an important consideration for companies when responding to attorney general inquiries and investigations.

The office can often appear to be more aggressive than other agencies, pursuing violations even among emerging companies, though it may consider suspended penalties in cases of financial hardship. Companies should also expect to encounter aggressively worded consent decrees — referred to as "assurances of discontinuance" — that contain detailed recitation of the attorney general's factual allegations.

Contributors:

Carrie Cohen

Partner

Morrison Foerster

Boris Segalis

Partner

Goodwin Procter

Katherine Wang

CIPP/US, CIPM

Associate

Morrison Foerster

MEMBER

Unlock this exclusive content and more

Join the IAPPAlready a member? Sign in

Membership opens up a world of resources

In-depth knowledge

From original research reports and daily news coverage to legislative trackers and infographics, we have the information you need to stay ahead of change.

A global network

Make valuable professional connections through more than 160 local IAPP KnowledgeNet chapters in 70 countries.

Access to the experts

Connect with top thinkers in privacy, AI governance and cybersecurity for fresh ideas and insights.

Learn what you get from membership